New publication of corsus regarding average rations for farm animals in Germany

Agriculture contributes significantly to exceeding planetary boundaries. In Germany, food consumption causes 2,060 kg CO₂e per person annually, which corresponds to 21% of the country’s consumption-related emissions [1]. Animal products in particular have a significant impact on the environment. Around 85% of climate-relevant emissions from animal products in Germany come from agriculture, with half of these emissions attributable to feed production and the other half to direct emissions from animal husbandry [1]. Despite the importance of feed production, there is a lack of statistical data on the average feed composition for different animal species in Germany. To close this gap, corsus was commissioned by the Agora Agrar think tank to conduct a study to determine the average feed rations for farm animals in Germany.

Based on a material flow analysis (MFA), the average feed composition and quantity for different animal species was determined on the basis of national feed consumption data [2], explains Dr Ulrike Eberle, managing director of corsus and project manager of the study. The analysis was based on the current three years specified in the statistics (2020/21 to 2022/23) and took into account feed that accounts for over 95% of feed consumption. To model average German animal husbandry systems, corsus used data from the German Agricultural Society (KTBL) [3]. The most important parameters included performance levels, husbandry systems and breeds. The high performance level was chosen as the standard, with the exception of conventional Holstein-Friesian dairy cows, for which the medium level was used to align with the national average milk yield. The data was harmonised on an annual basis, taking into account mortality rates and the economic distribution between by-products.

‘Although feed production accounts for a large proportion of the environmental impact of food consumption, there is a lack of statistical data on average feed rations for farm animals in Germany.’

Lieferung von Mischfuttermitteln in Deutschland [in kt]

The study utilized data from the Kuratorium für Technik und Bauwesen in der Landwirtschaft (KTBL) [4] to model average German animal husbandry systems. Key parameters included performance levels, housing systems, and breeds. The high-performance level was selected as the default, except for conventional Holstein-Friesian dairy cows, where the medium level was used to align with the national average milk yield. The data were harmonized to a yearly basis, accounting for mortality rates and economic allocation between co-products.

The study defined average animal husbandry management practices for:

  • Cattle: calf rearing, breeding heifers, dairy cows, suckler cows, and fattening)
  • Pigs: sow husbandry, piglet rearing, and fattening)
  • Poultry: pullet rearing, laying hens, broiler, and turkey fattening).

For compound feeds, where KTBL did not specify ingredient compositions, average formulas were modeled using data from German feed balance sheets. The most relevant feed ingredients included soft wheat (19%), maize grain (15%), soybeans (15%), and rapeseed (11%), among others. Expert judgment was used to define plausible compositions, which were validated using nutrient tables from the Bayerische Landesanstalt für Landwirtschaft (LfL) [4].

The results were compared with national feed supply statistics, showing a match within ±10% for compound feeds and maize silage. However, grass-based forages were 40–80% lower in the model, likely due to differences in water content or estimation methods. Adjustments were made to align grass forage quantities with official statistics.

The study provides detailed datasets on:

  • Feed input per animal and year
  • Compound feed composition
  • Feedstuff intake per animal and product
  • Annual supply values for feedstuffs and compound feeds

These datasets enable more precise analyses of the environmental impact of animal-based foods and support the development of optimisation strategies for sustainable feeding practices. The results fill a critical gap in understanding the GHG emissions and biodiversity impacts of livestock farming in Germany, facilitating the design of policy measures for sustainable food systems.

The study was supported by Agora Agrar and validated by experts in feed and livestock management.

Click here for the data publication.

References

[1] Eberle, U., & Mumm, N. (2024). Reduction potential of German environmental food impacts due to a planetary health diet. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-024-02352-4

[2] BMEL (2024): Tabellenübersicht Futteraufkommen, online: https://www.bmel-statistik.de/landwirtschaft/tierhaltung/futtermittel (consulted on October 10, 2024)

[3] Kuratorium Technik und Bauwesen in der Landwirtschaft (KTBL) (2024). Wirtschaftlichkeitsrechner Tier; currently under renovation; https://www.ktbl.de/webanwendungen (consulted on October 10, 2024)

[4] Bayerische Landesanstalt für Landwirtschaft (LfL) (2024). Gruber Tabelle zur Fütterung der Milchkühe, Zuchtrinder, Schafe und Ziegen, online: https://www.lfl.bayern.de/publikationen/informationen/040183/index.php (consulted on October 07, 2025)

© Copyright - corsus 2026